Reduce greenhouse gas by exporting coal? Yes, says Stanford economist
If Pacific Coast states construct sufficient coal export facilities, the United States is likely to sell heaps of coal to Asia in the years ahead, but that should cut – not raise – global emissions of greenhouse gases, according to Frank Wolak, professor of economics at Stanford University.
Over the past several years, U.S. natural gas prices have plummeted while coal prices have risen. That, combined with stricter environmental rules on coal burning, has caused U.S. electric utilities to use more natural gas-fired generators and fewer coal-fired power plants to produce electricity.
Coal’s share of U.S. electricity production has fallen from more than half 10 years ago to just a third currently.
Like us on Facebook!
- Guest: Weigh science, instead of conjecture, on dangers of coal-train dust
- Coal fight may cost us jobs, investment
- New Northwest ports important for ag exports
- Let’s be honest: The concern really isn’t about coal dust
- Farm bureau asks Inslee for caution on coal regulations
- Tri-City business leaders worry about coal export rules
- Terminal’s family-wage jobs, taxes would aid Whatcom County
- BNSF Responds to “Nuisance” Suit
- Report summarizes thousands of public comments about scope of environmental review for proposed Cherry Point export terminal
- Labor and Business Leaders Call for Reasonable Reviews of Proposed Export Projects
- Regulatory microscope threatens export growth
- Exporting coal to China is the greenest option
- A Columbia River Pilot’s View Of Coal Exports
- Cloud Peak Energy Announces Option Agreement with SSA Marine for Capacity at Future Cape Size Export Terminal in Pacific Northwest
- New Poll: Coal Exports Winning Support In Washington