Reduce greenhouse gas by exporting coal? Yes, says Stanford economist
If Pacific Coast states construct sufficient coal export facilities, the United States is likely to sell heaps of coal to Asia in the years ahead, but that should cut – not raise – global emissions of greenhouse gases, according to Frank Wolak, professor of economics at Stanford University.
Over the past several years, U.S. natural gas prices have plummeted while coal prices have risen. That, combined with stricter environmental rules on coal burning, has caused U.S. electric utilities to use more natural gas-fired generators and fewer coal-fired power plants to produce electricity.
Coal’s share of U.S. electricity production has fallen from more than half 10 years ago to just a third currently.
Like us on Facebook!
- Labor groups favor narrower review of Wash. coal export proposals
- Labor Blasts State Coal-Port Permit Plan – Calls it ‘Radical Environmental Economic Imperialism’
- American Farm Bureau Federation Endorses Coal-Port Projects – a Matter of National Interest
- Our area needs jobs export terminals would bring
- Labor unions support coal export project in Washington
- Moderation missing in discussions of future industry at Cherry Point
- Washington View: Trains safe, efficient for moving U.S. energy
- Army Corps, Ecology Announce Divorce – Will Write Separate Environmental Impact Statements on Coal Ports
- Our Voice: Make yourself heard on coal train proposal
- Banning coal simplistic, unreasonable and unwise Opinion: Mineral is part of the fabric of our human existence
- Ecology on Hot Seat About Coal-Port Analysis — Business Calls it Bizarre, Worrisome
- LABOR AND BUSINESS PRESENT A UNITED FRONT ON BULK COMMODITY TERMINALS
- More trade means trains
- Expanded review of coal terminal risks putting emotion before reason
- Special to The Spokesman-Review: Ozzie D. Knezovich