Reduce greenhouse gas by exporting coal? Yes, says Stanford economist
If Pacific Coast states construct sufficient coal export facilities, the United States is likely to sell heaps of coal to Asia in the years ahead, but that should cut – not raise – global emissions of greenhouse gases, according to Frank Wolak, professor of economics at Stanford University.
Over the past several years, U.S. natural gas prices have plummeted while coal prices have risen. That, combined with stricter environmental rules on coal burning, has caused U.S. electric utilities to use more natural gas-fired generators and fewer coal-fired power plants to produce electricity.
Coal’s share of U.S. electricity production has fallen from more than half 10 years ago to just a third currently.
Like us on Facebook!
- Carrix Positions SSA Marine for Growth
- Carrix, Inc. Significantly Boosts its Capital for Growth with a New Shareholder
- Gateway is about more than coal — it’s about jobs
- Washington coal port EIS hurts Montana jobs
- Former WTO Official: Washington’s Climate Change Standard for Coal Port Approvals Violates Int’l Treaties
- National Association of Manufacturers – Letter to Gov. Inslee
- State Tactic on Coal Ports Could Bring Trade Sanctions Against U.S., Warns National Association of Manufacturers
- The Poor Need Cheap Fossil Fuels
- State Officials From Coal Country Tell Washington Regulators to Watch Their Step on Coal-Port Permits
- American Farm Bureau – Letter to Gov. Inslee
- An Opportunity for Manufacturers and Exporters in the Pacific Northwest
- SMART supports Northwest export terminals
- Franz Kafa and the Department of Ecology | DON BRUNELL
- Labor groups favor narrower review of Wash. coal export proposals
- Labor Blasts State Coal-Port Permit Plan – Calls it ‘Radical Environmental Economic Imperialism’